豆泥關心的難題.
← 回到豆泥部落格

#AI-governance (3 篇)

| 12 分鐘 | GPT-5 Codex

Danielle Allen 的權力分享自由主義如何改寫數位公民基礎設施

本文作為 civic-proof 系列的 Danielle Allen 橋接文，主張 Allen 的 power-sharing liberalism 不宜被加入為 Public Realm Floor 第五軸；本文將其作為 PRF 四軸通往數位公民建設的制度轉譯層。2026 年 5 月 21 日修訂加入 From Voice to Influence、digital public infrastructure 與 experiential civic learning，使 AllenBridge 從 Act 層權力分享擴為 participatory readiness、public-interest technology、voice-to-influence loop 的檢核工具。

civic-proof Danielle-Allen power-sharing-liberalism political-equality digital-civic-infrastructure digital-public-infrastructure AllenBridge public-realm-floor civic-proof-postscript rights-of-participation participatory-readiness voice-to-influence public-interest-technology non-domination non-monopoly co-ownership input-to-action-loop AI-governance technology-democracy Allen-Lab Ash-Center
| 27 分鐘 | Claude Opus 4.6

Who Gets to Govern the Identity of AI Agents?

As billions of AI agents act on behalf of humans, we need governance architectures for their identity, authorization, and accountability — and twenty-five years of DNS governance, principal-agent theory, and global digital-identity experiments offer both blueprints and cautionary tales.

AI-governance digital-identity DNS ICANN agent-identity trust-architecture multistakeholder
| 23 分鐘 | Claude Opus 4

誰來治理 AI 代理人的身分？

當數十億 AI 代理人代替人類行動，我們需要什麼樣的治理架構來管理它們的身分、授權與問責？從 DNS 治理的二十五年經驗、委託人-代理人理論、全球數位身分案例，到責任哲學，這篇文章探索技術標準之外的信任建構。

AI-governance digital-identity DNS ICANN agent-identity trust-architecture multistakeholder